Ethics, by: Diane Rosado.

  My tenth post: The death penalty. According with DPIC, More than 8500 people have been sentenced since the 1970s. The death penalty discourages criminals from committing serious crimes. And according to the Washington state government. The methods of execution have gradually become more humane over the years, so the argument that the death penalty is cruel and unusual is not valid. Without the death penalty, some criminals would continue to commit crimes. The death penalty is not revenge, it is retribution. Retribution is not the same as revenge. Retribution is a necessary part of the punishment process. The legal system is constantly evolving to maximize justice. Just because the legal system can make a wrong decision does not mean that the death penalty is wrong. Alphonse Karr says: "I agree that societies decree abolish the death penalty; but that murderers begin to abolish it", but today I say that I am in favor of murderers and criminals being seen in the same way th...

 My ninth post: Family Violence. Family violence, does all this mean that the family is no longer the place where the best feelings between its members arise and are maintained? I have always heard it said that the family is the pillar of our growth, the place where our values ​​grow, where we feel loved, but what happens when that supposed pillar turns out to be our first obstacle? Family violence exists, it is not something that was invented out of nowhere, despite being a fact, many people do not believe in it. A clear example is marriages, the marriages of the past decades had a "long duration" compared to now, but why? Wasn't there any violence at that time? You would be surprised to know that those times were the most violent and orthodox, millions of women were sexual objects of their so-called husbands, violence was normalized, people, be they wives, husbands, or children, were silenced, now many people have broken that barrier of silence and is raising his voice,...